Friday, September 21, 2018

KTM duke 390 vs KTM RC 390

KTM duke 390 VS KTM RC 390

This comparison will be on the basis of Specs, price, top speed, faster acceleration and on other features. So My name is Yogesh welcome to my blog and Let's start the comparison with out wasting any more time-

1. KTM RC 390- 
                         Engine -373.2cc single cylinder, 4-stroke, 4-valve, DOHC engine
                   Max power- 43.50 bhp@9,000 rpm      Max torque- 35 Nm @7,000 rpm
                     Fuel capacity- 10 liters        mileage- 28 kmpl
                  Top speed- 179 kmph          0-60 - 2.68 sec       0-100  5.68 sec
For full information read this-
KTM duke 390 vs KTM RC 390, ktm rc 390 torque
KTM duke 390 vs KTM RC 390
This bike comes with 373.2 cc single cylinder, 4-stroke, 4-valve, DOHC engine. Which can produce the max power of 43.50 bhp @9,000 rpm and the max torque of 35 NM @7,000 rpm, It has single cylinder and 4 valves per cylinder and has fuel injection as fuel delivery system and has liquid cooled as cooling system. Ignition system is contact less, controlled,fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment. It's fuel tank capacity is of 10 liters and can give the mileage of 28 km per liter. It can reach the top speed of 179 km per hour. and can reach 0-60 in 2.68 seconds and 0-100 in 5.68 seconds. It has 6 speed gear box and disc brakes in both the tyres. It has WP upside down 43 mm as front suspension and WP mono shock as rear suspension. It get's 110/70-17 as front section tyre and 150/60-17 as rear section tyres and which are tubeless too. Wheel size is of 17 inch. It's kerb weight is of 159.5 kg and ground clearance is of 178.5 mm. This bike comes in two variants one without ABS and one with ABS. The price of ABS version is slightly higher as compared to without ABS model. Price of KTM RC 390 STD is 2,25,500 rupees ex-showroom Chandigarh, the price of KTM RC 390 ABS is 2,39,999 rupees ex-showroom Chandigarh.

2. KTM duke 390- 
                         Engine-  373.2 cc single cylinder, 4-stroke
                     Max power- 43.5 bhp @9,000 rpm   Max torque- 37 nm @7,000 rpm
                         Fuel capacity-  13.4 liters         Mileage-  28.5 kmpl
                      Top speed -  170 kmph               0-60 -  2.56 sec         0-100 - 5.60 sec
For full information read this-
KTM duke 390 vs KTM RC 390,ktm rc 390 vs ktm duke 390
KTM duke 390 vs KTM RC 390

This bike comes with 373.2 cc single cylinder, 4-stroke engine. Which produces the max power of 43.5 bhp@9,000 rpm and the max torque of 37 nm @7,000 rpm.  It has single cylinder and 4 valves per cylinder and has fuel injection as fuel delivery system. Ignition system is contact less, controlled,fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment and have liquid  cooled as cooling system. It has the fuel capacity of 13.4 liters and can give the mileage of 28.5 km per liter. It can reach the top speed of 170 km per hour and can reach 0-60 in 2.56 seconds and 0-100 in 5.60 seconds. It has 6 speed gear box and disc brakes in both the tyres. It has WP upside down 43 mm as front suspension and WP mono shock as rear suspension. It get's 110/70-17 as front section tyre and 150/60-17 as rear section tyres and which are tubeless. Wheel size is of 17 inch. It's kerb weight is 155 kg and the ground clearance is 185 mm. This bike comes with duel channel ABS. Price of this bike is 2 lakh 43 thousand  ex-showroom chandigarh.

So these were the specs of Duke 390 and RC 390.
So according to me RC 300 has more top speed but the acceleration of duke 390 is better than RC 390 . Both of them have same power but the duke 390 has a pinch of more torque. RC 390 is also a little bit heavier than Duke 390. So which is more practical. According to me if you are a person like me who love long rides then RC 390 is not for you. But if you want a bike for track racing only then RC 390 is only for you. According to me both of these bike's are not good for long ride's but in their comparison You can go with Duke 390.



0 comments: